<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- $Workfile: oai.asp $ $Revision: 15 $ $Date: 2/23/04 5:30p $ -->
<!-- $Workfile: functions.inc $ $Revision: 14 $ $Date: 2/17/16 5:30p $ -->
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='./oai2html.xsl' ?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<responseDate>2026-10-17T02:29:18Z</responseDate>
<!-- $Workfile: GetRecord.asp $ $Revision: 13 $ $Date: 2/17/16 5:30p $ -->
<request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dbk.gesis.org:SDN/10.7802_2533" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">http://dbkapps.gesis.org/dbkoai/oai.asp</request>
<GetRecord>
<record>
<header>
<identifier>oai:dbk.gesis.org:SDN/10.7802_2533</identifier>
<datestamp>2023-03-23</datestamp>

		<setSpec>SDN</setSpec>
	</header>
<metadata>
<!-- $Workfile: metadata-oai_dc.asp $ $Revision: 10 $ $Date: 2/17/16 5:30p $ -->
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://dbkapps.gesis.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
<dc:title>Nuclear rhetoric and escalation management in Russia&#8217;s war against Ukraine</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Horovitz, Liviu,  Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Arndt, Anna Clara,  Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>10.7802/2533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.7802/2533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.7802/2533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.7802/2533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.7802/2533</dc:identifier>
<dc:date>2023</dc:date>
<dc:language>de</dc:language>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:description><![CDATA[The research data described below was produced by the Working Paper titled "One Year of Nuclear Rhetoric and Escalation Management in Russia's War Against Ukraine: A Chronology," covering the period between February 24, 2022, and February 3, 2023. Understanding Russian-Western nuclear interactions throughout the year of 2022 is the focal point of the research project. In particular, the following aspects have been brought to the fore: what statements and actions with a nuclear dimension did Russia and the West make in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine? What reactions did Russia’s nuclear rhetoric trigger? In turn, how did Russia react to Western rejoinders, warnings and counter-threats? To answer these research questions, the researchers collected all politically significant statements and actions by the Russian Federation and Western states, particularly the United States and NATO allies, with a nuclear dimension. The study was led by Dr. Liviu Horovitz and Anna Clara Arndt and was financed by the Strategic Threat Analysis and Nuclear (Dis-)Order (STAND) project at SWP, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Defence. In summary, this study provides a comprehensive chronology of the nuclear rhetoric and escalation management strategies employed by Russia and the West in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

other keywords: nuclear weapon, nuclear disarmament, nuclear signalling, nuclear policy
weitere Schlagworte: Nuklearwaffen, Atomwaffen, Nukleare Abschreckung, Atompolitik]]></dc:description>
<dc:description><![CDATA[The research data described below was produced by the Working Paper titled "One Year of Nuclear Rhetoric and Escalation Management in Russia's War Against Ukraine: A Chronology," covering the period between February 24, 2022, and February 3, 2023. Understanding Russian-Western nuclear interactions throughout the year of 2022 is the focal point of the research project. In particular, the following aspects have been brought to the fore: what statements and actions with a nuclear dimension did Russia and the West make in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine? What reactions did Russia’s nuclear rhetoric trigger? In turn, how did Russia react to Western rejoinders, warnings and counter-threats? To answer these research questions, the researchers collected all politically significant statements and actions by the Russian Federation and Western states, particularly the United States and NATO allies, with a nuclear dimension. The study was led by Dr. Liviu Horovitz and Anna Clara Arndt and was financed by the Strategic Threat Analysis and Nuclear (Dis-)Order (STAND) project at SWP, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Defence. In summary, this study provides a comprehensive chronology of the nuclear rhetoric and escalation management strategies employed by Russia and the West in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

other keywords: nuclear weapon, nuclear disarmament, nuclear signalling, nuclear policy
weitere Schlagworte: Nuklearwaffen, Atomwaffen, Nukleare Abschreckung, Atompolitik]]></dc:description>
<dc:coverage>All statements and actions with a nuclear dimension by Russia and Western states.</dc:coverage>
<dc:coverage>Time series
TimeSeries</dc:coverage>
<dc:contributor>GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences</dc:contributor>
<dc:publisher>GESIS Data Archive</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
